Intel ARC 140T Shows Major Integrated GPU Performance Gains in Demanding Modern Games
High-bandwidth system memory alongside a strong H-series processor enables the ARC 140T to reach higher sustained graphics frequencies.
Hardware by RereRara on Nov 25, 2025
The most powerful integrated GPU from Intel is being tested, and its performance is better than that of other ARC-based iGPUs. The chipset is inside a small mini PC.
A full review isn't possible yet because the embargo period is still in effect. Still, early performance metrics show the results are already very good. ARC 140T is a big improvement over older integrated ARC options, especially when used with fast memory and a powerful CPU.

Intel ARC 140T Architecture and System Configuration
Intel ARC 140T is very different from the lower-end 140V model. The 140V is based on the newer XE2 architecture, but the 140T uses XE cores with XMX engines and is paired with Intel's H-series 200 processors. This setup lets the 140T run at higher clock speeds and use more CPU power, improving overall performance.
This system has LPDDR5X memory running at 8400MT/s, a big step up from previous tests that used only 5600MT/s SODIMM memory.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H with 16 cores and 16 threads powers the platform. The GPU can dynamically allocate up to 18GB of system memory as VRAM. The faster memory and powerful CPU give the iGPU the bandwidth and processing power it needs to really get going.
Software, Drivers, and Memory Allocation Controls
The newest Intel ARC driver adds a helpful system for overriding shared GPU memory. In the past, iGPUs would report incorrect VRAM amounts at launch in some games, leading to errors or incorrect settings.
You can manually assign up to 27.5GB of shared GPU memory with the override option. If you leave it off, the system can still scale up to about 18GB when needed.
Power Configuration and Testing Conditions
Core Ultra 9 285H can boost up to 110W, but this system is set up to run at a steady 65W TDP. Most of the games that were tested don't fully use 65W, staying just below it.
The power-balancing behavior lets the iGPU maintain high clocks without starving the CPU, resulting in stable performance across a wide range of workloads.
Synthetic Benchmark Performance
Geekbench OpenCL, the first synthetic benchmark, gives the ARC 140T a score of 40891. The ARC 140T is clearly ahead of AMD's Radeon 890M in the Ryzen AI HX 370 running at 65W, which scores just above 37000.
ARC 140T scored 4833 overall and 4348 in graphics in 3DMark Time Spy, further highlighting this advantage. In contrast, the 890M scores 4038 overall and 3649 in graphics.
Even though synthetic results often show that Intel's ARC architecture is better than real-world gameplay, the numbers still show that the 140T is Intel's best iGPU so far.
.jpg)
Cyberpunk 2077 Performance Results
At 1080p, the High preset in Cyberpunk 2077 turns on XESS Quality by default. The iGPU averages about 56 fps, but drops below 60 in more demanding areas.
However, it stays stable at high settings. With XESS frame generation and XC low latency enabled simultaneously, performance exceeds 80 fps, providing a smooth gaming experience and demonstrating that it works well with Intel's frame generation technology.
Horizon Zero Dawn Remastered Gameplay
Horizon Zero Dawn Remastered runs well at 1080p Medium with XESS Balanced. But to get much higher framerates, you need to lower the graphics preset or resolution.
Going down to 900p makes a bigger difference. With this setup, FSR frame generation works and raises the average framerates to over 70 fps. But the game is still hard for most iGPUs.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider Benchmark Results
The built-in benchmark runs at 1080p Medium and averages 76 fps. The 890M, on the other hand, usually runs at about 71 fps at the same 65W TDP. The improvement is small but steady, which shows that this title has a clear edge.
Borderlands 3 Performance Overview
Borderlands 3 runs at 74 fps on Medium settings at 1080p after shader compilation. When you first see some particle effects in the game, it can stutter a lot. Still, the performance gets better after that and stays that way.
God of War Ragnarok Testing Results
At 1080p Low with XESS Balanced, God of War Ragnarok averages 67 fps. When you lower the resolution to 900p and keep the same settings, performance goes up to the mid-80s. This title doesn't support frame generation on this hardware setup, but the game is still very fun to play.
Elden Ring Stability and Visual Settings
At 1080p High, Elden Ring stays close to 60 fps, but it sometimes dips to 59 fps. Overall, it stays very consistent. Because the game has a built-in 60fps cap, it's hard to notice small dips in real gameplay. At maximum settings, the frame rate drops to about 52 fps, but at high settings, the experience is more balanced.
Forza Horizon 5 Performance Details
At 1080p High, Forza Horizon 5 averages 84 fps without scaling. Most iGPUs, like the 890M, require Medium settings to reach 90 fps. This result is very impressive because of that. XESS could make things even better if they wanted to, but the game already runs smoothly at these settings.

Evaluation of the ARC 140T's Overall Capability
ARC 140T is the best Intel ARC-based iGPU so far. The 140T has the best integrated graphics performance because it features XMX engines, faster memory, and a high-end CPU, even though it lacks the newer XE2 cores found in the 140V.
Power distribution at 65W keeps clocks steady, keeping both the CPU and GPU balanced under heavy workloads. The 140T is better than the 140T, but it is still not as good as more powerful mobile iGPUs like AMD's Radeon 8060S, which has 40 compute units.
Intel could push the limits of integrated GPUs even further with future designs featuring more XE cores and better cooling. For now, though, the ARC 140T is Intel's best product because it runs a wide range of modern games at 1080p with good performance.
Also, check our other Intel articles below:
- Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Review And Performance Breakdown (2025)
- Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D: In-Depth Gaming Performance and Benchmark Comparison
- Intel Core i5-13400F Gaming Performance: Still Worth It in 2025?
- Intel Core i9‑14900K vs. AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Power Profiles & Gaming Benchmarks
- Intel Core i9 14900K: Specs, Benchmarks, and Competitor Comparison
- Intel Core Ultra 5 245K Review: Gaming, Productivity & Power Efficiency Tested
- Intel Core Ultra 9 285 K's iGPU Gaming: In-Depth Benchmarks & Analysis
- Intel vs. AMD Gaming Laptop: Performance, Thermals & Battery Life Compared
- AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs.7800X3D vs. Intel Core Ultra 7 265K: Gaming, Thermals & Price Analysis
Contributor, NoobFeed
Latest Articles
No Data.

