The RAM Market Problem That Is Quietly Reviving DDR4 Adoption
Motherboard availability and compatibility concerns accelerate renewed interest in proven DDR4 configurations.
Hardware by Naheyan Tahmin on Feb 02, 2026
Memory costs are going up, some suppliers are rolling out new features slowly, and others are doing it very quickly. This is throwing off the balance of the hardware market right now.
When there isn't as much competition, goals can change quickly. This is shown by new updates to Intel's graphics software, upscaling technology, and Linux support.

Overview of the Sponsor Segment
Before it moves on to better images, Anaba is still a place to buy games for PC, PlayStation, Xbox, and Nintendo. You can buy odd Steam keys, look for games that are on sale, and get gift cards for games like Roblox, League of Legends, and Valorant. You can get games for less money if you use discount codes and return options.
Intel Moves Forward Even Though It Has a Small GPU Market Share
Intel has about 0.5% to 1% of the discrete GPU market, but it is providing software enhancements faster than AMD. Intel has added support for XeSS 3 multiframe generation in the latest Newark driver. We haven't tested this driver yet because it only works with newer integrated graphics, like the ARC B390 and B370.
Intel has said that next month, ARC B-series and A-series GPUs will be able to make XeSS 3 multiframe. Right now, the only platforms that work with Panther Lake systems are those with Core Ultra 300 CPUs and built-in GPUs. Core Ultra 200V, 200, 100, B-series, and A-series products will have support in the future.
Improvements to XeSS 3 Rendering
Intel is adding the latest graphics improvements to XeSS 3, such as better lighting through ray tracing and global illumination. These updates should make the graphics clearer, the textures better, the handling of larger shapes better, and the output smoother. To improve quality, XeSS 2.1 already does a good job, especially on Intel GPUs that use XMX instead of DP4A. However, it's still not as good as DLSS4, DLSS4.5, or FSR4.
Because of these rendering enhancements, we should expect improved upscaling and multiframe generation. AMD doesn't have a similar approach right now, especially for machine learning-based multiframe creation.
Intel is the Leader in Making Machine Learning Frameworks
With XeSS 2, Intel was the first company to make frame generation based on machine learning. AMD also recently released a similar method called FSR Redstone. Even though Intel has a smaller market share, it is currently releasing multiple generations ahead of AMD.
This is the first time that XeSS 3 multiframe generation has been made publicly available. Intel said that this feature is part of the launch driver stack for Core Ultra Series 3 devices that include built-in ARC B390 and B370 graphics. As soon as B580 support is ready, we will start testing.
Scaling Performance and Driver Behavior
Intel has released statistics showing that up to 3 frames can be generated, leading to up to 4 times the frame rate when the GPU isn't the problem. When the CPU is limited, which can happen more often because of Intel driver overhead, frame rates can go up. In most real-life circumstances, performance gains are projected to be closer to 3.5 times.
Overrides at the Driver Level and Independence for Developers
When the application supports it, Intel Graphics Software lets you change the settings for XeSS frame generation. You can choose to generate 2x, 3x, or 4x multiframe images without waiting for developers to add the feature themselves. This method isn't perfect, but it does make people less dependent on game updates.
Intel has said that XeSS 3 works with games that are already XeSS 2. It is still acceptable that the features available depend on what each game shows and which XeSS parts are included.
Comparison of XeSS Feature Stacks
XeSS started as a way to get super resolution across different vendors that needed Shader Model 6.4. The XMX-optimized approach gives greater image quality on Intel GPUs. XeSS 2 included support for low latency and frame creation based on machine learning. Both of these features were adopted faster than AMD's.
Anti-Lag2 is still one of the least used features of AMD. Even though Intel has fewer GPUs, XeSS-reduced latency is already more widely used. This disparity raises questions about AMD's top software investment objectives.
Linux Support and Problems That Keep Coming Up
You may need to run Steam from the terminal, and even though it is fully installed, Blender integration is still not working properly.
Testing across a range of distributions shows that Intel GPUs are still less compatible with Linux than AMD and Nvidia GPUs. Improvements are still being made, but they aren't always steady.

Valve and Software Momentum on Linux
Valve is still pushing Linux adoption with Proton and engineering at the platform level. This momentum is making more software developers want to support Linux. GOG has begun shifting its engineering effort to Linux, underscoring its growing importance.
Support for Linux is getting better all the time. AMD does well, Nvidia does okay, and Intel is still behind but is making improvements.
Final Thoughts
The launch of AMD's FSR Redstone had little effect in the real world. Ray regeneration is still only available in one game, and features like radiance caching haven't been included yet. There have been problems with the speed and stability of machine learning frame generation.
FSR is still the best at upscaling, though XeSS now offers better frame and multiframe generation. Intel is still pushing for new software ideas, but AMD is going slowly, even if it has more resources.
Also, check our other hardware articles below:
- AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Review: Setting The Standard For 2025 Gaming CPU
- Amazon Luna 2025 Review: Is Prime Gaming's Cloud Service Your Go-To For Casual Fun?
- AMD RX 9070 XT Review: AMD's RDNA 4 Champion for 1440p Gaming
- GeForce Now Ultimate: Ditching Your Gaming PC For Cloud RTX 4080 Power?
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Review (2025): Still A 4K Gaming Powerhouse?
- Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Review And Performance Breakdown (2025)
- AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Review: 3D V-Cache Goes God Mode with Stunning Gaming Performance
- Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D: In-Depth Gaming Performance and Benchmark Comparison
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Super Performance In Cyberpunk 2077: Path Tracing & DLSS 4.0 Tested
- AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT In Cyberpunk 2077: Ray Tracing & FSR 4.0 Tested
- Intel Arc B580 Review: The $250 GPU Revolutionizing 1440p Gaming
- Intel Arc B570 Vs. B580: Value, Specs, And Real-World Gaming Performance
- RTX 5090 Laptop Vs. M4 Max MacBook Pro: Ultimate Raw Performance Vs. Battery Endurance
- Intel Arc b580 Vs. RTX 4060: Game Performance And Value Analysis
- RTX5090 Hell Is Us Demo 4K Ultra Benchmark: DLSS Vs. Native Performance Guide
- NVIDIA RTX 5070 Review: Mid-Range Muscle or Marketing Hype?
- Nintendo Switch 2 Review: Handheld Performance, Features & Value Breakdown
- RTX 5070 Ti Review: Performance, Thermals & Power Efficiency Tested
- Samsung Odyssey OLED G81SF Review 2025: Ultimate 32-Inch QD-OLED Gaming Monitor
- AMD RX 9070 Performance Review: Thermals, Clocks, and Real-World FPS
- AMD Ryzen 5 7600 Review: Best Budget Gaming CPU of 2025?
- AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT Review: RDNA 3 Power For Midrange Gaming
- Asus ROG RTX 5090 Astral OC Vs. Founders Edition: The 4K Gaming Benchmark
Editor, NoobFeed
Gaming Hardware Updates
No Data.
